WELCOME

You are reading the thoughts of one who has kept them mostly out of the public venue. By virtue of the concept, blogs seem narcissistic so you can expect a lot of personal pronouns to show up.

I don't like being pigeonholed, though many have called me a conservative. I agree with much of what is often considered conservative views, but I do tend to occasionally differ on this view point. I have also been termed opinionated. Well, please remember this is my view, and I consider my view valid until convinced otherwise. That doesn't necessarily make it right; it simply makes it my view.

Please feel free to leave a comment.

NOTE: The posts in this blog are duplicates of the column I write for the Perris City News and Sentinel Weekly.

All right, let's get started. You are about to read neither the rantings of a madman nor the reflections of a genius. Perhaps somewhere in between:

August 9, 2013

Census and Nonsense

“Vee haf vays of making you talk. You vill tell us efry tink.” Sounds like an old NAZI spy movie with a greasy Gestapo interrogator in a bad German accent salivating over the prospect of torturing the hapless hero for information. But wait, that’s not the Gestapo, it’s… it’s…the US Census Bureau! And they are here to make me fill out the mandatory American Community census survey.

That’s right folks; it is MANDATORY. Section 221 of the US Code Title 13 states:

“Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or
    willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any
    other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce
    or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the
    Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his
    knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in
    connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I,
    II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to
    the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or
    farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not
    more than $100.”

I guess they figure they’re giving us a break. Until 1976, that section carried a $250 fine and sixty days jail sentence. The penalty jumps to $500 if you get any of the answers wrong -- and I thought college exams were tough.

Title 13, enacted on Aug. 31, 1954, chapter 1158, 68 Statute 1012, seems reasonable enough. The US Constitution calls for an “enumeration” every ten years. That would certainly give congress authority to enact a law that pertains to taking the necessary head count. After all, we are a republic. A head count is necessary to fairly allocate the required representatives.

In true government fashion, though, they seem to have taken their authority a step beyond what was intended in that pesky Constitution. No longer do they just want to know how many people live where. They can ask absolutely anything that comes to their narrow little minds, and they can do it whenever they want. Here’s the real kicker, it’s required by law!

I’m no lawyer, but I can read. The language in the US Constitution is clear on this matter. An enumeration is to be taken every ten years for the express purpose of determining the allocation of representatives in congress. There is nothing in the Constitution about requiring the populous to divulge the number of toilets in their house or any other personal data whenever the bureaucrats decide to squeeze us for information.

This law is right up there  with removing tags from mattresses in the asinine factor. At a time when our government is surreptitiously collection our phone information and requiring Internet companies to reveal data on their subscribers, it is difficult to believe they don’t already know everything about us from our birth date to our sock size.

I, for one, have nothing to hide, but the idea that our government can REQUIRE me to divulge personal information without the constitutional authority to do so cuts against my grain.

The Census form is still sitting in my office. The Census Bureau continues to send letters and emails prodding me to fill it out. The other day a nice lady from the local Census Bureau office showed up at my gate to “help” me fill out the form. As politely as I could, I informed her that I needed no help, and am not inclined to divulge my personal information to her or the Census Bureau. I gave the necessary information on their head count in 2010. There is no constitutional requirement to volunteer any other information until 2020.

She was very nice, and told me she doesn’t enforce Title 13, but that participation in all censuses is a requirement.

Maybe they will send the Gestapo to interrogate me. I’ll grant them this much though, they are persistent. For all the tax dollars they wasted on trying to squeeze information out of me, they could have help fund another Obama vacation. Gee, I hope he doesn’t suffer because of me.

Global Warming: The Cause of All Evil?


The headline in a German news article from Der Spiegel read, “Scientific Feud: Does Global Warming Make Us More Violent?” I couldn’t pass this up. Global warming is being blamed for a lot of things, but violence? Are the pseudo-scientists at it again?

Apparently, Der Spiegel isn’t the only news magazine to pick this up. The article spoke of other news reports that displayed headlines such as; "Hotter Weather Actually Makes Us Want to Kill Each Other," a headline chosen by the Atlantic, "Rise in violence 'linked to climate change,' wrote the BBC, "Global Warming Is Greatly Increasing Crime and Other Conflict," it read in the Huffington Post. According to Spiegel, several German outlets have run variations on the "Climate of Violence" theme with Focus Online leading the way sporting the headline, "Agro-Heat Turns People into Killers."

Okay, now I’m worried. Is he old boogey-man, Global Warming responsible for everything bad that happens? I couldn’t find my keys the other day. Was it the fault of the weather? Is Obama missing the boat by blaming his troubles on his predecessors instead of placing the blame on Global Warming? Are we really as gullible as the pseudo-scientists believe us to be?

Deeper in the article we find that this frenzy of misinformation was set off by a study from a team led by Solomon Hsiang from the University of California, Berkeley. Other scientists accuse them of, “using questionable statistical methods, of arriving at dubious conclusions and even of a tendentious selection of data.” Those familiar with my column may recall that I have demonstrated the fallibility of statistics. Repeating a lie enough times may make people believe it’s true but a much faster way is to use statistics.

Sports scores don’t lie; they are a direct outcome of a competition. Recorded temperature measurements are likewise reliable; they are the record of calibrated instruments. It’s when you selectively plot the recorded measurements over time and plug them into mathematic equations that you can make them “prove” whatever thesis you want. Now take the results of skewed statistics and correlate them with a selection of events biased to your desired outcome and you have the Big Lie destined to be accepted as truth.

Is the earth in a warming period? Some credible scientists say it is. Equally credible scientists say it is not. It’s enough to make us all neurotic. Now take this ambiguous data and mix it with a selected set of violent events and voila you have “proved” Global Warming causes violence. But wait…no; it “proves” no warming causes violence.

Now mix in the other ambiguous data on greenhouse gases and you find that we are actually responsible for global violence. Throw in more “data” and you find your car, lawnmower, barbecue, and fireplace are causing your neighbors to be violent. And here all along you may have thought they were just jerks.

All right, that issue is solved. What else can I “prove” for you? How about “Proving” Global Warming causes obesity, or maybe how Global Warming causes politicians to say and do dumb things? That one, I might actually believe.